Kavanaugh vs Ford

I haven't convicted BK.  But I do employ rational means to form an opinion about which of them is more likely to be lying.



Others can do that too simply by examining some of SEVERAL truths we |DO| know about Brett Kavanaugh's alleged attempted rape of that poor girl --- let's review.



1) We know ONE side wants an investigation and another side does not.



2) We know ONE side wants to call witnesses; the other side does not.



3) We know ONE side took a lie detector test and passed it; the other side has not.



4) We know one side can say she's NEVER been referred to DOJ in the past for lying under oath; the other cannot.



Then line up these facts and decide --- which one of them goes into the "not" column in EVERY instance? Kavanaugh, of course. It looks like HE'S the one hiding something.





_______________________________



Lets try employing rational means to form an opinion about which of them is more likely to be lying. Let's review:

1) We know ONE side wants an investigation and another side does not.

2) We know ONE side wants to call witnesses; the other side does not.

3) We know ONE side took a lie detector test and passed it; the other side has not.

4) We know one side can say she's NEVER been referred to DOJ in the past for lying under oath; the other cannot.


Then line up these facts and decide --- which one appears to be willing
to have her story checked out by the FBI, the polygraph, and by at
least one hostile witness?

And which of them seems to wish
there'd be NO polygraph, NO investigation, and NO witnesses called in
and has ALREADY been in the barrel over suspicion of lying under oath?

Clearly, she's the more credible.  



__________________________





This isn't rocket science. ONE of them is hiding something, and even my 2nd graders could figure out which it is.

1) We know ONE side wants an investigation and another side does not.

2) We know ONE side wants to call witnesses; the other side does not.

3) We know ONE side took a lie detector test and passed it; the other side has not.

4) We know one side can say she's NEVER been referred to DOJ in the past for lying under oath; the other cannot.




I lined up these facts and considered --- which one appears to be
willing to have her story checked out by the FBI, the polygraph, and by
at least one hostile witness?

And which of them seems to wish
there'd be NO polygraph, NO investigation, and NO witnesses called in
and has ALREADY been in the barrel over suspicion of lying under oath?

Nah --- he's certainly ACTING like he did it.  All one has to do is line up these facts and decide --- which one
appears to be willing to have her story checked out by the FBI, the
polygraph, and by at least one hostile witness?

And which of
them seems to wish there'd be NO polygraph, NO investigation, and NO
witnesses called in and has ALREADY been in the barrel over suspicion of
lying under oath?

Clearly, she's the more credible.  



I wondered if maybe BK didn't molest those women; but then, I looked at the facts.

1) We know ONE side wants an investigation and another side does not.

2) We know ONE side wants to call witnesses; the other side does not.

3) We know ONE side took a lie detector test and passed it; the other side has not.

4) We know one side can say she's NEVER been referred to DOJ in the past for lying under oath; the other cannot.


Then I lined up these facts and considered --- which one appears to be
willing to have her story checked out by the FBI, the polygraph, and by
at least one hostile witness?

And which of them seems to wish
there'd be NO polygraph, NO investigation, and NO witnesses called in
and has ALREADY been in the barrel over suspicion of lying under oath?

Nah --- he's certainly ACTING like he did it.