Pale's Riddled Flaws
In an attempt to support one of his wacky claims, Palerider cut and pasted a piece in the chat room. Curious as to who really wrote it, I tracked it down. It was from a web site founded by a guy who claims to be the creator and builder of a Reagan memorial. Some credentials, eh?
This interesting statement was in the piece Pale borrowed: "Taking a further examination of riddled flaws, the eleven paragraphs are
skewed with dangerous illusions of missile defense desperate to distort
the American public."
Now try to untangle that. A missile defense is "desperate to distort the American public"? What the hell does THAT mean? And what the HELL are "riddled flaws"? Our author doesn't say, and no one else seems to know either.
http://missiledefenseadvocacy.org/alert/the-dangerous-illusion-of-all-the-news-that-is-fit-to-print/
I wondered if maybe Pale was the author of that piece. After all, this is an example of his writing style.
22 PM: Palerider [Quote] -- 10:38am -- Fri, Jul 8, 16 pst
Palerider
Verichez another mischaracterization and one I've you've already corrected for you, so. as I just noted, your additional existing questions generally underscore my characterization of you, your posts and your questions.
This interesting statement was in the piece Pale borrowed: "Taking a further examination of riddled flaws, the eleven paragraphs are
skewed with dangerous illusions of missile defense desperate to distort
the American public."
Now try to untangle that. A missile defense is "desperate to distort the American public"? What the hell does THAT mean? And what the HELL are "riddled flaws"? Our author doesn't say, and no one else seems to know either.
http://missiledefenseadvocacy.org/alert/the-dangerous-illusion-of-all-the-news-that-is-fit-to-print/
I wondered if maybe Pale was the author of that piece. After all, this is an example of his writing style.
22 PM: Palerider [Quote] -- 10:38am -- Fri, Jul 8, 16 pst
Palerider
Verichez another mischaracterization and one I've you've already corrected for you, so. as I just noted, your additional existing questions generally underscore my characterization of you, your posts and your questions.
