Saturday, April 29, 2017
Bring Up Clinton!
4440 PM: Mistysea [Quote] -- 3:22pm -- Tue, Aug 1, 17 pst
Mistysea
When they know they are wrong they bring up Clinton.
4803 PM: Marta8point5 -- Sat, Apr 8 6:19am pst
Marta8point5(This week's lament: Bush leaked!)
They can't stop talking about Clinton because they are out of ideas.
9890 PM: Luvy -- Tue, Dec 28 5:34am PST
Luvy
You bring up Clinton when you lose the argument.
1900 PM: Mistysea -- Sat, May 22 5:48am PST
Mistysea
When [they] can't defend their arguments they try to change the topic to Billy Jeff Clinton.
7259 PM: Marta8point5 -- Sat, Apr 23 5:41am PST
Marta8point5
oh dear not clinton again...who cares about him...isn't he a has been?
6856 PM: Dudley -- Mon, Dec 20 5:32pm PST
Dudley
The left is always talking about Clinton.
3957 PM: Marta8point5 -- Sun, Jan 30 6:45am PST
Marta8point5
Clinton isn't the president any more so why bring him up?
3751 PM: Dino -- Mon, Dec 6 2:37pm PST
Dino
Someone tell Natchez Clinton isn't president anymore.
Friday, April 28, 2017
Trump's Deal Making Not Working
Trump is discovering that shaping public policy isn't quite like negotiating the purchase of an airplane.
In 1987, he offered a ridiculously low $5M for a $30M aircraft.
The tactic may have worked for Trump, as he wound up paying only $8 million.
What did he stand to lose, though, if the potential seller had walked away?
Nothing. He could simply have looked for another airplane to purchase.
Fast forward to the present: Trump demanded congress fund his border
wall as part of a deal to keep govt open. It was the rough equivalent of
offering $5M for a $30M aircraft; except in this case, the congress
pretty much told Trump to go piss up a rope.
This is public
policy; not wheeling and dealing in aircraft. As opposed to the 1987
deal, in this case Trump has PLENTY to lose by not negotiating in good
faith. He stands to see his reputation suffer; and he stands to possibly
lose control of both the House and of the Senate if he insists in
pushing for absurd deals that benefit no one.
In 1987, he offered a ridiculously low $5M for a $30M aircraft.
The tactic may have worked for Trump, as he wound up paying only $8 million.
What did he stand to lose, though, if the potential seller had walked away?
Nothing. He could simply have looked for another airplane to purchase.
Fast forward to the present: Trump demanded congress fund his border
wall as part of a deal to keep govt open. It was the rough equivalent of
offering $5M for a $30M aircraft; except in this case, the congress
pretty much told Trump to go piss up a rope.
This is public
policy; not wheeling and dealing in aircraft. As opposed to the 1987
deal, in this case Trump has PLENTY to lose by not negotiating in good
faith. He stands to see his reputation suffer; and he stands to possibly
lose control of both the House and of the Senate if he insists in
pushing for absurd deals that benefit no one.
Who's Stupid Now?
World leaders look at Trump and think,
''That STUPID SUMBITCH put a FOREIGN AGENT on his national security
team? Then BLAMED Obama for it?''
''That STUPID SUMBITCH put a FOREIGN AGENT on his national security
team? Then BLAMED Obama for it?''
Hillary Was "Careless"?
Remember what Comey said in smearing Hillary? He used the word ''careless.''
Compared to Trump, though, she's the most careful person in the world.
Try to imagine the howling from the right if Hillary Clinton had
appointed a FOREIGN AGENT to sit in on top level national security
briefings - as Trump did.
Compared to Trump, though, she's the most careful person in the world.
Try to imagine the howling from the right if Hillary Clinton had
appointed a FOREIGN AGENT to sit in on top level national security
briefings - as Trump did.
Tuesday, April 11, 2017
Trump Claims Credit for Obama Economic Expansion
Trump claims credit for jobs growth, citing numbers he has said at least NINETEEN TIMES are fake. His WH spokesman even admitted Trump used to say the numbers were bogus; but now embraces them since taking office.
Mark, these, words.
When the Trump recession comes (not if, but when), it will be called ''The Trump Slump.''
And SUDDENLY, the lying liars who support Trump will credit Obama, not Trump, with the state of the economy.
Mark, these, words.
When the Trump recession comes (not if, but when), it will be called ''The Trump Slump.''
And SUDDENLY, the lying liars who support Trump will credit Obama, not Trump, with the state of the economy.
Thursday, April 6, 2017
Tuesday, April 4, 2017
More Smearing of Susan Rice
Can you imagine it?
Defense Atty: ''Your Honor, we have a problem here.''
Judge: ''What's that?''
Defense: ''The officer asked to see my client's drivers license.''
Judge: ''What the fuck? Who are you? A goddamned Trump-nut?''
Defense Atty: ''Your Honor, we have a problem here.''
Judge: ''What's that?''
Defense: ''The officer asked to see my client's drivers license.''
Judge: ''What the fuck? Who are you? A goddamned Trump-nut?''
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)